Californian dialect

In any language, we can see a variable diversity. In American English, because of social aspects that diversity the most recognizable and colorful. Population in United States consists from the different ethnic groups, communities, because that country is an immigrant’s land. Therefore, it is not surprisingly that we have the most large linguistical diversity around the world. For example, large ethnic group of Mexican-American population in California created their own dialect Chicano English. Usually it is very common in the area bilingual speakers to mix native language with second language. Grammar, lexicon pass between two language with specific adaptation. Minor ethnic group uses special “lingustical glue” to adopt both languages in one surge. In addition, because today Hispanic speakers have a great population in California Americans also adopted some innovations in American English. Also a great influence on language played Chinese and Japan ethnic groups, which had their settlement since 1950 yy. after a Second World War. Another influence was created by Hollywood images. All that lingustical innovations depended from social and historical aspects. As any language American English transformed in a new form and will be have other transformations while political, historical and demographical aspects will be have developing.

ethnography of speaking

Ethnography of speaking

SPEECH IN COGNITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR
In the study of ethnography , presumably three things will hold true: 1. the discipline of linguistics will continue to contribute studies of the history, structure, and use of languages; 2. in other disciplines, linguistic concepts and practices will be qualified, reinterpreted, subsumed, and perhaps sometimes re-diffused in changed form into linguistics; 3. linguistics will remain the discipline responsible for coordinating knowledge about verbal behavior from the viewpoint of language itself.

In our concern is the role of phonological habits in the perception and interpretation of sounds, there exists an abundance of theory, technique, and experimental work. The concern is the role of semantic habits in perception and interpretation of experience, there is no such abundance. Some experimental testing has been done (see comment in Hymes 1961b), but we cannot adequately investigate the role of semantic habits in ordinary behavior without knowledge of the semantic habits that are available to play a role, and such knowledge can be gained only by description in relation to native contexts of use. In other words, we need a semantic analysis that is a part of ethnography.As a narrative reflection of reality ethnography requests for a structural analysis, achieving the economics of the rules of a grammar in relation to a series of analyses of texts. As we can see from our texts we saw two different reflections of the speaking. One is a closest community (church members in specific region South London) and another is a examples of the phenomena as a “Kros” definition of the New Guinea. Different kinds of the interactions, lingustical expressions (as an semantical level). How do social-cultural expectations reflect on the speech and behavior people. As the closest ties of the definitions of the mental system in the anthropological view. How is it different from our lingustical behavior in the class? Freedom of the speech, however politeness and official expression, following the main topic of the class theme. All that 3 variable lingustical situations give as a good observations about ethnography and relation ethnography with psychology and anthropology.

ydenysen

ethnography of speaking

Ethnography of speaking

SPEECH IN COGNITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR
In the study of ethnography , presumably three things will hold true: 1. the discipline of linguistics will continue to contribute studies of the history, structure, and use of languages; 2. in other disciplines, linguistic concepts and practices will be qualified, reinterpreted, subsumed, and perhaps sometimes re-diffused in changed form into linguistics; 3. linguistics will remain the discipline responsible for coordinating knowledge about verbal behavior from the viewpoint of language itself.

In our concern is the role of phonological habits in the perception and interpretation of sounds, there exists an abundance of theory, technique, and experimental work. The concern is the role of semantic habits in perception and interpretation of experience, there is no such abundance. Some experimental testing has been done (see comment in Hymes 1961b), but we cannot adequately investigate the role of semantic habits in ordinary behavior without knowledge of the semantic habits that are available to play a role, and such knowledge can be gained only by description in relation to native contexts of use. In other words, we need a semantic analysis that is a part of ethnography.As a narrative reflection of reality ethnography requests for a structural analysis, achieving the economics of the rules of a grammar in relation to a series of analyses of texts. As we can see from our texts we saw two different reflections of the speaking. One is a closest community (church members in specific region South London) and another is a examples of the phenomena as a “Kros” definition of the New Guinea. Different kinds of the interactions, lingustical expressions (as an semantical level). How do social-cultural expectations reflect on the speech and behavior people. As the closest ties of the definitions of the mental system in the anthropological view. How is it different from our lingustical behavior in the class? Freedom of the speech, however politeness and official expression, following the main topic of the class theme. All that 3 variable lingustical situations give as a good observations about ethnography and relation ethnography with psychology and anthropology.

ydenysen